Tuesday, 19 April 2011

Harper Hitler Photo

Harper Hitler


Online voting and renewing our democracy

It makes sense that Canada's political opposition to democratic renewal in a problem. If they were happy with the way people express themselves in the last election just 2.5 years ago would not be in the middle of another choice now. Furthermore, compared with best practice elsewhere, democracy is incomplete in Canada: a legislative body does not respond to people and, for more than a decade, voters in three provinces in Canada have been growing significantly underrepresented in the House of Commons.
However, in its platform of "Respect and renewal of our democracy", the Liberal Party is silent on structural reforms, literally, would give more power to the people, but focuses on improving voter turnout at it easier to vote.
"It is time to harness its power to bring the electoral participation of citizens. A Liberal government will lead Elections Canada to develop an online voting option, from a pilot project for individuals serving overseas in the Canadian Armed Forces and the federal government, and higher-education students who live outside their districts of origin. The pilot of support from a broader discussion with Canadians on an online voting option for all voters. "

Nobody wants to look at love and reactionary or opposed to experimentation, but some tricks are bad ideas in their own right.
People can bank, and breaks in play online at secure sites. There is nothing particularly innovative about the online voting. In certain circumstances it may make sense. The broader rationale, however, should be debated.
If physical discomfort was a decisive factor in the participation of citizens, why are least fit three times more likely to vote than young people? More importantly, it is really a step forward to make little effort to vote? Boil for the task of nanoseconds in a keyboard that looks more important to those who do not care now? Finally, a nanosecond is all that a democracy needs its citizens?
The most daunting, difficult - and important - in the performance of our duty is to decide whom to vote - something that is easy to avoid, even during the three hours that employers are obliged to give in to vote. Walk or drive to the polling station, however, creates its own sense of urgency and challenges the brain to think about their civic responsibility and what we hope to make our politicians.
It also goes to the polls is a social movement time. It forces us to think about what they are there, with others, do. Sitting at a computer in a game of sweat suit with a software program Elections Canada or the CBC Vote compass is simply not enough.

anada’s management question: majority, coalition or minority government ?

So are the times just in Canada that a national election is actually being fought on the size of the prize.
With rare vehemence, Stephen Harper, said that unless the Conservatives achieving a "stable national majority" Canada will face a Liberal-NDP coalition backed by the separatist Bloc Quebecois. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said Saturday, in a written statement and a press conference. His rejection has two problems: (1) not completed and (2) puts it in the position of defending the status quo adhockery minorities.
Insisted
"Whoever leads the party that wins most seats in the election day must be called to form the government," Ignatieff said. "If that's the Liberal Party, then you need to find quickly the confidence of the newly elected Parliament. If our government can not win the support of the House, then Mr. Harper called to form a government and face the same challenge. That is our Constitution. It is the law of the land. "
He described the coalition as "a legitimate constitutional option," but pledged to work with other parties on an issue by issue. "
The reverse takeover stressed lined up what is most likely to happen: the Conservatives win more seats and more votes. The choice of your statement is what keeps almost exactly what almost took place in the winter of 2008. Instead of approving a Speech from the Throne and wait six weeks, Ignatieff was released to a confidence vote immediately on a victorious minority Harper to form a coalition / agreement with the NDP. The Governor General is conceivable you could use it to form a government if it could not support stable fashion for at least one opposition party of another.
Of course, Ignatieff carry out other press conferences and can promise to give a new Harper government reasonable time to govern and keep praising the virtue of multi-party minority government of multiple crises.
But instead of speculating about what the leaders can say to each other, and the Governor General, after the elections, we will re-elections and the people.
A formal coalition Liberal-NDP coalition against Harper's Conservatives would give voters direct power to elect a clear winner. Democracy and governance would be strengthened. A center-left coalition would be taken seriously simple and would be legitimate, if the Liberals and the NDP recognizes the option now.
However, both Ignatieff, Jack Layton and are formally a campaign to win outright to be the next prime minister, that the minority government work. Ignatieff enthusiastically in the register of Lester Pearson's minority governments in the sixties.
The possibility of another minority government can sound better than the prospect of a coalition government, but not necessarily more attractive than the alternative-a stable majority. After three minorities in 1968, Canadians elected a majority of no-nonsense. The winner, Pierre Trudeau, was contemptuous of minorities Pearson hesitation, promised to strengthen and reform, and dared people to make a clear decision.
This year could be bad for Ignatieff to run as a liberal Pearson.

Mr Taleeb Noormohamed


Mr. Taleeb Noormohamed has been Chief Executive Officer, President and CEO Serebra Learning Corp. since February 22, 2011. Mr. Noormohamed Serebra joined in July 2010 and served as a consultant until February 22, 2011. Serebra joined after helping deliver the successful Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter as Vice President, Strategy and Alliances. Mr. Noormohamed served in key positions in the Government of Canada and became a successful ... launch of an innovative entrepreneur online community dedicated to transforming the way students connect with teachers to learn. It has also managed business development for a leading solutions provider of online sales management, and founded and directed the e-business strategy consulting for a global professional services organization. Mr. Noormohamed holds a BA from Princeton University and did his doctoral work at the University of Oxford.

Canadian Party Leaders' Debate

Ignatieff .. seems like he has great potential. But he is attacked both as a harpist and deflects criticism difficult, looks nervous. I question the wisdom of attacking Layton Layton Ignatieff because he will not get a minority, and attacks Ignatieff is also potentially swinging for Harper .. Jack: I know Ignatieff represents a party that knows .. not really far to the left .. but .. coalition of left! or merger! otherwise it will be perpetually fragmented left .. and Harper remains in power ...

Why does Duceppe never have the opportunity to speak? But yes, this debate is not what peripheral platforms of each party are, I do not know what each are running for.

I would lose my job if I was as helpless as if Harper is to explain my actions.
that are screwed in politics in Canada.
Democracy? Where?

Ignatieff sounds like John Kerry. Harper appears as a more intelligent, sinister version of Bush. We need an NDP majority government. Jack Layton is slack in the attack on the left, it apears that `s in Harper` s sides, and many of us know this, but I guarantee you will be misunderstood by the general population. The left has to stay together.
This country is at its best when it `s been the center left, period. We have health for all, and many social support programs. Everyone uses social programs, children, parents, old, rich or poor, and are attractive to new citizens.


Basically, Harper's vision of democracy is not right. I mean, I have fear that it could have the majority, I do not want that type at the head of a conservative majority in our country, I mean, virtualy, which could almost be a dictator, and I'm glad you did not realize that sewing otherwish that would be dramatic.
Therefore, all persons who were not informed in politics and stuff (because our education system is so slow): Friends, only ..... Harper simply do not vote, please, love for our country.

I would characterize the relationship between Stalin and Hitler as "frenemies. Also, there Layton and Ignatieff are characterized as Hitler and Stalin, the comparison is not commensurate. To be clear: I think it is plausible that the National Development Plan could lead to results more favorable than the Harper government. But, realistically, it is unlikely that in this election the NDP to come out on top. (However, contrary to its interpretation does not mean that voting NDP supports the Conservatives.)

The idea that the enemy of my enemy is my friend is simply wrong. Stalin and Hitler were my enemies. I will not side with Stalin just because he was against Hitler.
We can strengthen the National Development Plan, and make only stop a Conservative majority government.
I am not against a coalition, I think they are a big part of our parliamentary democracy. I am, however, against the idea that voting for the NDP in any way supports the Conservatives, it is 100% wrong.

The pressing problem instigating this election: to bring Harper down. What is the point in throwing knives at Ignatieff, strategically knives (I) should be saved for Harper. Is not Juan and Miguel on the same side in this regard? Your enemy is my enemy because you are my friend. Why do not we get along (and form a coalition)?

Sunday, 10 April 2011

Leaders of The Liberal Party - About Michael Ignatieff

Michael has been fighting for equal opportunities since his student days. As a young man, he campaigned for Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau.

Is a leader who listens. Since being elected to Parliament, Michael has traveled to every province and territory, sharing his vision with Canadians in communities large and small.

Wherever he goes, Michael is involved Canadians in a conversation about our future. Your message has been one of hope together we can build a stronger Canada for our families.
Canadian author, human rights expert Michael Ignatieff is the political leader of the opposition Liberal Party of Canada. Shortly after the coalition between the New Democrats, the Bloc Quebecois and the Liberals suspension was overturned by the successful Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Parliament until January 2009, Liberal leader Stephane Dion, announced his resignation. Ignatieff was one of three candidates to take over the party leadership, but the other two candidates, Dominic LeBlanc and Bob Rae, announced that they would fall out of the race on December 8 and 9, two conversations respectively.1 Election increased after the liberal acceptance of a plan of conservative budget in late January 2009.


As leader of the Liberal Party, Michael Ignatieff sets the tone. We keep hearing about how you take the road and all that.

Well, I do not think that is true, as revealed in the way that Michael Ignatieff called Stephen Harper (Conservatives and other) evil:

Speaking to a Stampede breakfast crowd of about 150 to kick off a summer tour bus across Canada, Ignatieff said Prime Minister Stephen Harper, suggesting that the conservative is the extreme right of most Canadians.

"We are the center of progressive reform in Canada. I can not emphasize how much they are in the middle," he told supporters.

"You know that smell the smell of sulfur from the type (Harper) - right to know these guys really are."

The joke of sulfur is not ambiguous. Is a clear reference to Satan, the prince of darkness, the embodiment of evil Canadians who share a Christian heritage. For Canadians, whose background is different, the model of sulfur is easy to understand, as the Christian devil is a common enough to become almost secular.

Is this what you really think Michael Ignatieff? Or is it a comment script? I think it's the first, if only because Michael Ignatieff talks about "this man" and "these kids." Such informality seems genuine. I believe that Michael Ignatieff is talking about the band, and reveals his true feelings.

Michael Ignatieff is unplugged. Michael Ignatieff, Stephen Harper, believed to be the devil himself.

Stephen Harper is not bad. This is not a philosophical difference of opinion between Stephen Harper and Michael Ignatieff.

Stephen Harper is evil.

And apparently I'm too bad, being one of "these kids."

Not long ago, the Liberal Party got in trouble when he published a photo showing Stephen Harper was fired after being featured in a contest whose prize was a t-shirt of the Liberal Party. Liberal apologists said that the people running the competition and the maintenance of the website is "asleep at the switch", which is patently false. It is clear that people who build web pages are awake and know what they are doing.

But now I understand why these people thought making a picture, Stephen Harper, his assassination was appropriate for a competition, and appropriate for online publication. As I said, Michael Ignatieff sets the tone, and if in public, speaking extemporaneously, he can say without shame that Stephen Harper is the devil himself, I can only imagine what it says on the office, out of sight of the cameras, surrounded by fellow liberals.

That kind of talk is filtered down and each one takes the example of her. Michael Ignatieff did not personally approve of publishing a picture of Stephen Harper has skyrocketed. And there would (hopefully) if it had been requested, but only because he would have realized that it would have been a bad political move.

That would have been the only reason for not publishing it, however. Anyone working in that atmosphere Stephen-Harper-is-the Devil would not think the picture itself was inappropriate in a moral sense. If Stephen Harper is evil, then the fact shown in the photograph is a moral good. It should be. And so the image was posted by people who are not as subtle as other liberals who understand that a moral good, as the destruction of bad things could still be politically costly if not sent a message.

I do not believe that Michael Ignatieff is bad, nor do I believe that liberals in general are bad, either. This despite Michael Ignatieff published articles in support of torture, and this despite the Liberal Party members still being punished for stealing public money on the sponsorship scandal.

I think evil is a real thing, and that call evil someone is a serious accusation. Few people, in my opinion, the increase to that level of moral turpitude to be truly evil. But if I'm wrong, it probably would not be able to recognize.

How wrong do you understand? If Stephen Harper is the devil, what about his wife, Laura? Is too bad, or just a hapless victim, as Rosemary Woodhouse in Rosemary's Baby? And what of the two, Stephen Harper, of children? If properly called Devilspawn?

better ideaTasha Kheiriddin has its version of "sulfur", Stephen Harper, the smell, and rightly points out that "the comparison of the prime minister to the Lord of the Underworld is the kind of blow under the left-wing bloggers take, not a comment line with the leader the "Liberal Party, and perhaps expose Michael Ignatieff was common sense or trying to impress his listeners with intelligent control of the metaphor.

Things, Stephen Harper can not get away with it: I do not like "what if" scenarios, but let's be frank. If Stephen Harper had said the same about Michael Ignatieff, we would be inundated with a flood of statements, the main stream media experts nationwide to fund at least read liberal blogger who was "proof" Stephen Harper is a Christian fundamentalist with a hidden agenda. But not heard, Stephen Harper, saying things like this. Perhaps practicing Christians know better than to accuse someone of being reckless "evil" because they know that evil is a bit of laughter, although there are examples of demagogues who claim to religious knowledge seem to forget this. But when it comes to cheapen the word by overuse it, is that atheists are the worst, because for some reason are allowed to get away with it.
In the House of Commons, Michael has led the fight for gender equality. His own law of private law, C-471, recognizes a human right to equal pay for work of equal value.

It has been proposed innovative new Liberal policy to strengthen our pensions and health, to help families care for their loved ones at home, and to give every child a fair chance to the promises of Canadian life, from preschool to post-secondary education.

As leader of a Liberal extraordinary team, Michael has led to the priorities of working families to Parliament, driven by its belief that equal opportunity is what makes Canada great, and that together we can lead the world again.

Throughout his career, Michael has been a champion of freedom and democracy around the world. As a journalist witnessed the aftermath of the genocide in Rwanda, the chaos of the former Yugoslavia, and the shadow of tyranny in Iran. As Canada's representative to the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Michael was a pioneer in the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect, which has since been adopted by the United Nations. He is the author of 17 books and has received 11 honorary doctorates, a Gemini Award and the Governor General's Award for nonfiction.

Zsuzsanna husband, father of Theo and Sophie, a passion for Canada and a world class leader - Michael Ignatieff is working to get your family, your future and priorities in the middle of the next government of Canada.




Au Liberal Party Leader Tony Abbott Leader of the Opposition

Tony Abbott was elected to Warringah in the elections in March 1994. Before entering Parliament he was Executive Director of Australians for Constitutional Monarchy 1993-94. From 1990-1993 he was press secretary and political adviser to opposition leader, Dr John Hewson. His previous career was in journalism, he wrote a reporter of 'The Bulletin' and 'The Australian'.

Tony Abbott became leader of the opposition Leader of the Liberal Party of Australia Au, December 1, 2009

In the election of the Howard government in 1996 was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. In this position he was responsible for creating the successful program for youth Greencorps.

After the 1998 elections was appointed to the new portfolio of Minister for Employment Services. As Minister, he oversaw the development of the network and a major expansion of Work for the Dole.

In January 2001, Tony was promoted to Cabinet as Minister of Employment, the leader of the Liberal Party of Labour Relations and Small Business. After the 2001 elections was appointed Minister of Employment and Workplace Relations, the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia Leader of the House and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister of Civil Service

Tony was appointed Minister of Health and Ageing on 7 October 2003.

After the election in 2007, Tony became Shadow Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and the Voluntary Sector, followed by the shadow Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. In December 2009 he became leader of the opposition. He has written two books in defense of the existing constitutional system, "The Monarchy minimum" and "How to win the constitutional war." In 2009 he released his latest book Battlelines.



Education:

St. Ignatius Riverview

The University of Sydney

* Economics / Law
* First Grade Rugby
* President of the SRC

Rhodes Scholar, Oxford University

* MA, Politics and Philosophy
* Won two blue boxing
* St. Patrick's Seminary, Manly

Ron Paul Liberal Leader 2012

Q: Is Ron Paul Liberal or Conservative?


A: He is a conservative, VOTE for whoever you want at least your conscience will be clean when this country worsens. All those asswipes who recommend voting for someone "electable" are the same asswipes who never fail on electing morons to the presidency. More troops have sent Ron Paul money than any other candidate...You want to support the troops? LISTEN to what they are saying.

people forget who decides who is electable? our media, you know does reporters who love to give you their opinions as news? because they SOOO have our best interest at heart.



Marijuana users appear to be divided in supporting either Barack Obama (Democrat) or Ron Paul (R) in primary voting state where presidential candidates are voted. Although it seems Obama's message of "change" has been drawing fans, it is imperative that you understand the distinct differences between Obama and Paul when it comes to marijuana and the war against drugs.
Barack Obama has said CLEARLY IS NOT legalize marijuana or in any way alter the drug war, except that it has pledged to halt the DEA raids against medical patients in California. His comment was: "It is a misuse of resources." Period. In all the videos of Barack Obama was asked about medical marijuana, which expresses no sympathy or empathy on this issue. Since joining the Senate in 2004, Barack Obama has never sponsored or voted for any legislation that repeals any aspect of the war on drugs. Barack Obama has always voted to fund the war in Iraq, every vote in the Senate.

In addition, Barack Obama responded to the Partnership for a Drug Free America "question presidential candidate saying that would increase the war on drugs and empower federal drug courts. Obama will make the war on drugs worse in America!

Partnership for a Drug-Free America: Senator Barack Obama Response
Advertising

1. I believe that successful conservation of drugs outside the U.S.? S streets requires a holistic approach that transcends the boundaries between local, state, and federal law enforcement. As president, I will take several steps to strengthen efforts to reduce alcohol and drug abuse in communities across America.

First, I believe that the struggle to combat drug abuse requires the close cooperation of international partners such as Mexico and Canada. I worked to secure federal funds for groups working inter-jurisdictional in Illinois, and I have supported the State Department in the recruitment of the international community to combat the vast network of drug cartels who find customers in the United States . As president, I will expand such initiatives to all corners of the apparatus of drug enforcement.

Secondly, I will ensure that states have the resources to support existing drug courts, which have proved effective in the treatment of nonviolent offenders. These courts offer a mix of treatment and sanctions, rather than traditional incarceration.
Currently, the Department of Justice makes grants available to state and local governments to establish drug courts. I will replicate these efforts within the federal criminal justice system by signing a bill that would authorize federal judges
preside over drug courts and federal agents to monitor offenders probation? compliance with drug treatment programs.

Third, I will continue to fight methamphetamine abuse, and to strengthen the implementation of methods. In the U.S. Senate, which co-sponsored the Act to Combat Methamphetamine, 2005, the principal parts of which became law in 2006. The bill puts federal funds in the fight against
methamphetamine, provides assistance to children affected by meth abuse, and to impose restrictions on the sale of ingredients used to make the drug. He also co-sponsored and fought for an amendment to the Justice Department to increase funding for enforcement programs, and support to take on the Mexican cartels are supplying chemicals to make methamphetamines.

Fourth, I will support after school programs. These programs keep children safe and away from bad influences, and help build safer communities and stronger. I think we need to increase federal support for after school programs with proven records of success in helping children avoid crime and drugs.

Finally, I will promote healthy communities and work to strengthen our public health and prevention systems. I will promote healthy environments, which include restricted advertising for snuff and alcohol to children and wellness and educational campaigns. I will increase funding to expand community-based interventions for prevention to help Americans make better decisions to improve their health.

2. Parents are our first line of defense against alcohol and drug abuse, but we have to support them in this effort. First, some parents lack the knowledge and tools to discuss this issue with their children, and we have to give these parents with resources and information. We inform parents about substance abuse problems from the beginning and then reinforce their children reach the vulnerable age. My health plan includes strengthening our public health and prevention infrastructures so that parents get the information you need about substance abuse, and guidance on how to talk about it. And my plan of poverty requires the creation of? Promise Neighborhoods? in our cities to support similar initiatives in public health.

Second, some parents simply are not taking the time to participate with their children about this issue. We have to tell parents to turn off the TV, save the game and spend some time providing the guidance our children both need and want. Parents have to strike up a conversation with your children and warn against the dangers of drug use. As president, I will ask parents to do this.

I understand the importance of being fully involve parents with their children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I? I've been very open about my struggles as a young man growing up without a father at home. I had to learn very early to say what was important and what was not? T, and exercise their own discretion and sense myself rising. Along the way, I made mistakes. And so we recognize the importance of parents talking with their children and participate actively in this issue, and promote these values ​​as president.

- Www.drugfree.org / Portal / DrugIssue / Features / Presidential_Candidates_Weigh_In

Ron Paul:

* He voted against (John Walters) Budget of the drug czar EACH YEAR

* It is co-sponsor of the law of the State Medical Marijuana Act

* Is the principal sponsor of 2007 ACT INDUSTRIAL HEMP

* Votes AGAINST all anti-marijuana advertising EACH YEAR

* Votes AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE credits (money) for each year DEA

Ron Paul has many videos where he promises POT SORRY EVERYONE, and release all NO VIOLENT JAIL federal drug law offenders. Ron Paul will restore voting rights to all offenders previously convicted federal drug law. Ron Paul Free Will hundreds of thousands of African Americans. African Americans were not released by Obama because few medical marijuana patients are black - and virtually none of the blacks in jail (over 600,000 blacks in U.S. prisons for drugs) would be released prohibition under Obama. These same people would be freed, pardoned and have their voting rights restored by the president of Ron Paul.

When Wolf Blitzer of CNN asked Ron Paul for his first act as national president on January 4, Ron Paul said he would order the Justice Department to stop the arrest sick people using marijuana in states that have legalized for medical use. Wow!

Ron Paul has voted against the Iraq war from the beginning and has always voted to defund the Iraq war and foreign military EMPIRE.

I urge fellow stoners to look beyond Barack Obama "Likeableness" and see that there is substance to Barack Obama on matters of war against drugs. He supports the ban, period. In fact, because Obama used marijuana and cocaine in his youth, is likely to have to over-compensate the white voters and religious voters and promise to maintain the paradigm of drug war, which is what happens Many ex-smokers (Clinton, Gingrich, etc.) that are in "high" office!

Ron Paul first act as president will stop the DEA immediately. He says this despite being a complete statement of risk. Ron Paul believes in the truth and not let the influence of the elective principle, based on individual freedom and the U.S. Constitution.

Ron Paul has never seen marijuana, but is the most sincere and true and correct on the question that our globe former Obama. Former pot smokers are often more eager to show how sorry they are prohibitionists for their "sins of youth", when the opportunity presented to them.

With Ron Paul, no such compromise is possible. No comparison. Obama is a fraud, Ron Paul is a liberator.

TUESDAY, PLEASE, faithful to our CULTURE AND VOTE FOR THE HERO OF THE PEOPLE POT: Ron Paul.

And if any influence, Ron Paul, no doubt overturn the extradition request by the prosecution and the BC3, including myself, Greg Williams and Michelle Rainey. Therefore, all the tens of thousands of Americans who have wondered how you can do more for me in my battle with the DEA and the U.S. Justice Department, which can do more for me to do more for all U.S. pot people: campaign and vote and tell everyone you know to RON PAUL for president in 2012

Liberal Party Leader Taleeb Noormohamed

NORTH VANCOUVER – An Ismaili candidate who is a veteran of the federal Liberal scene in Ottawa has narrowly defeated another Indo-Canadian candidate to take the nomination for North Vancouver into the next federal election.
Taleeb Noormohamed, 34, won the Liberal nomination race Saturday, edging out North Shore News sales manager Dee Dhaliwal approximately 460 votes to 430, according to unofficial tallies, reported North Shore News.
District of North Vancouver Coun. Roger Bassam came third in the race, with Kevin O’Brien, a former MLA in the Northwest Territories, a distant fourth.
Both Noormohamed’s and Dhaliwal’s camps signed up more than 500 new members prior to the vote on Saturday, swelling Liberal ranks in North Vancouver to about 1,400 from under 300 party members just a couple of months ago.

Meet Taleeb

Taleeb Noormohamed have a permanent connection to the community of North Vancouver, which began nearly 30 years old when his family moved to the area. As a child, attended Taleeb Maplewood Elementary School, a short walk from the family home in Riverside Drive. The family business started in the basement of his family's home, continues to grow in North Vancouver.



Education

After Maplewood, Taleeb attended St. George's High School and in 1994 received a scholarship to attend Princeton University where he studied International Relations. While in college, Taleeb led a number of student organizations, including a mentoring program for students in the city center, the high school.

After graduating from Princeton, Taleeb attended Oxford University with a grant from the Commonwealth for his doctoral work in Geography.



Professional Experience

Taleeb began his career by founding a technology consulting practice. After working in this field for several years, Taleeb sought a new challenge. In 2003, Taleeb chose to follow his passion for public policy, and began working in the public sector. Taleeb joined the Privy Council Office where he worked under two ministers Liberal government (Chrétien and Martin), and worked on a number of issues, including governance and Canada's place in the world.

In 2006, Taleeb was appointed Director of the Air Review Secretariat and Senior Advisor to the Hon. Bob Rae. In this capacity Taleeb to review all procedures of international and national levels, and in close collaboration with Canada's National Security Agency, RCMP and CSIS. Under the leadership of Taleeb, permanent monuments to the victims of the bombing of Air India flight 182 were built, one in Vancouver's Stanley Park, the other at Toronto's Humber Bay Park East.

After his work on the Air India file, Taleeb was asked to assume the role of Director of Citizen Participation in the federal government department of Public Safety. Taleeb was responsible for establishing policies for community involvement for the Department and the RCMP and CSIS.

More recently, Taleeb served as Vice President of Strategy and Alliances for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC). Taleeb was responsible for managing, among other things, the Association of Revenue, Government and International Relations and National and International Client Services. Taleeb was a key element of VANOC "Canada Games" initiative, which seeks to include all Canadians in the celebration, and was the principal negotiator behind the agreements that led to the city of North Vancouver and the District of Vancouver 2010 Olympic Games family.

Taleeb also understands what it means to run a small business. He is the main change and the restructuring of a company of online learning technology to its President and CEO, the creation of new high-tech careers for local professionals. From raising capital to make payroll each month to help reduce costs and save money, Taleeb understands the challenges facing small businesses.



Community Involvement

Taleeb is a firm believer in the importance of local community service. His community service work includes his contribution as a member of the Board of Directors of Covenant House in Vancouver and the West Vancouver Community Centre. He is a former member of the Board of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. In 2010, Taleeb was appointed as the representative of British Columbia to the Board of Trustees of the Fathers of Confederation Trust Lands and the Confederation Centre of the Arts at the Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz.

Besides his work with these organizations, volunteers Taleeb widely within the Ismaili Muslim community.

In recognition of his many contributions to the community, Taleeb was awarded the Canadian Governor General's care by the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, in 2007.



Languages

Taleeb is fluent in both official languages ​​of Canada and also speaks Persian, Gujarati and Hindi.

Leader of the Liberal Party - Michael Ignatieff Political Career

An intellectual and academic Michael Ignatieff had been a few years of his adult life in Canada before returning in 2005. He became a member of parliament in 2006 general elections. While Michael Ignatieff had studied, written and taught about human rights, democracy, security and international affairs, political opinions often seemed theoretical, liberal party of canada and was gaffe prone. Anyway, took an early lead on a large field of contenders in the race for the Liberal leadership after 2006, Paul Martin, resigned. In a surprising upset, Stéphane Dion won the fourth ballot and Michael Ignatieff, was second. Current policies

During the 2011 election the Liberal party's policies include:

    * Introduction of a family care plan for Canadians supporting ill family members
    * Pension plan reform
    * Additional investment in higher education
    * Deficit reduction and spending restraint
    * Maintain corporate tax rates at 2010 levels
    * Restoration of the long-form census
    * Quadruple renewable energy production, including wind, solar and biomass energy sources
    * Introduce a national food policy to support Canadian farme

After three years as a member of Parliament Michael Ignatieff, a new candidate for the Liberal leadership, this time to replace Stéphane Dion after the 2008 elections. In announcing his intentions of leadership, Ignatieff said that things had changed - he was more experienced, listened better and was better known. In December 2008 a crisis in Parliament brought the possibility of a close election and the  Democratic Party of Canada Liberal Party moved quickly to solve the problem of leadership by appointing Michael Ignatieff, Liberal Party interim leader. His position as leader was ratified liberal party of canada by the full party members at a convention in May 2009.
Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada:

December 2008 to present
Birth:

May 12, 1947 in Toronto, Ontario. From the age of six weeks, his family moved after his father's diplomatic career. At the age of 11, Michael Ignatieff, he returned to Toronto as a border in the Upper Canada College.
Education:

* Degree in History - University of Toronto
* University of Oxford
* Doctor in History - Harvard University

Career of Michael Ignatieff

* Michael Ignatieff has taught at Harvard, Cambridge, Oxford, the University of California, University of London and the London School of Economics.

* During his career, Michael Ignatieff has been a commentator, critic and broadcaster TVO, CBC and the BBC.

* Michael Ignatieff is the author of 16 books of fiction and nonfiction.

Political Party:

Liberal Party of Canada
Horse riding (electoral district)

Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Michael Ignatieff's political career:

* Michael Ignatieff was first elected to the House of Commons in the 2006 federal election.

* It happened in the Liberal leadership race to replace liberal party leaders Paul Martin in late 2006 but was second to Stéphane Dion.

* He was appointed Deputy Head of the Liberal Party leader of Stéphane Dion.

* Michael Ignatieff in Etobicoke Lakeshore was reelected in the 2008 federal elections.

* In November 2008, Michael Ignatieff, announced that it would be a candidate for the Liberal leadership race to replace Stéphane Dion.

* In December 2008, with the possibility of another federal election that arise suddenly, the two other leaders canadidates, Bob Rae and Dominic LeBlanc, withdrew from the race for the leadership. Michael Ignatieff was named interim leader of the Liberal Party.

* Michael Ignatieff position as Liberal Party leader, was ratified at the Liberal convention, held in May 2009.

Liberal Leader - Michael Ignatieff - liberal party leaders

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on May 12, 1947, son of a Russian emigre father and Canadian mother. He read history at the University of Toronto and earned a doctorate at Harvard University. He is a former Senior Research Fellow at King's College, Cambridge, and has held professorships at Harvard, Cambridge, Oxford, the University of California, University of London and the London School of Economics, and is now one of the Leaders of the Canadian Liberal party.

A regular broadcaster and critic on television and radio, Michael Ignatieff has hosted many programs including Channel 4's voices, the arts of the BBC on green party leader The Late Show, and award-winning series of blood and belonging: Travel on the new nationalism, first screened by the BBC in 1993, examining the question of nationalism in the twentieth century. His first book, the just measure of pain: Prisons in the Industrial Revolution, 1780-1850, a study of the English penal system, was published in 1978. The Russian Album (1987) is a memoir of his family's experience in nineteenth century Russia and his subsequent exile to Europe and finally Canada. He won the Governor General's Award for nonfiction (Canada) and the Heinemann Award. His first novel, Asya, a love story of a Russian living in Paris and London during the Second World War, was published in 1991, and was followed by Scar Tissue (1993), a powerful examination of love and acceptance loss, which was shortlisted for the Booker Prize for Fiction and the Whitbread Novel Award.

His acclaimed biography of Isaiah Berlin, the result of ten years research, was published in 1998. Was selected for the Jewish Quarterly Literary Prize for Non-Fiction and the James Tait Black Memorial Prize (for fiction). The warrior's honor: Ethnic war and modern consciousness (1998) is an examination of modern warfare and its complex moral implications, and Virtual War: Kosovo and Beyond (2000), which won the George Orwell, is a study of bombing NATO in Kosovo, and liberal party of nsw human rights as politics and idolatry (2001) is an account of the successes, failures and prospects of progress in human rights. His most recent book on ethnic war and intervention, Empire Lite: Nation Building in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, was published in 2003. Charlie Johnson in the Flames: A Novel, the story of a veteran war correspondent, whose eruption expedition to the Balkans war is life-changing consequences, was published in the same year. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror was published in 2004.

Michael Ignatieff is also the author of a TV, Dialogue in the Dark, an exchange between the dying philosopher David Hume and the writer James Boswell, based on the diary and Boswell's own book liberal party au Ignatieff needs of strangers (1984 .) The film was directed by Jonathan Miller for the BBC in 1989.

Michael Ignatieff returned to Canada from U.S. in 2005 and is now the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.